Legal Opinion

City of Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1996No. 85888Published

1Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

The Attorney General [AG] asks on rehearing that we clarify the retrospective contours of our October 10, 1995 pronouncement, which condemns as unconstitutional the provisions of 40 O.S.1991 §§ 196.1-196.14, the so-called Little Davis-Bacon (or Prevailing Wage) Act. We are urged that the court’s opinion should be given a limited backward reach1 because “hundreds” of laborers’ prevailing-wage claims and “numerous” contracts will be affected by our sentence of nullity. The AG argues that if the declaration of a statute’s invalidity has not been clearly…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Robinson v. NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API