Medved v. Baird
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Ordinarily either an order granting 2 or refusing 3 to grant a motion to make a pleading more definite and certain is not appealable because it does not prevent a judgment from being taken and that the order can then be reviewed upon an appeal from the judgment. Even an order or a judgment that dismisses a complaint for failure to comply with an order to make more definite and certain is not appealable if it is not a final judgment so as to preclude further action between the parties upon the subject matter being litigated. 4 However, where, as in this case, the order dismissed the complaints…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Alexander v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Puhr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Motowski v. People's Dentists of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Sorenson v. National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laska v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Dalton v. MeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Millard Gutter Co. v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- Millard Gutter Co. v. Farm Bureau Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.