Legal Opinion

State v. Pinela

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1992No. 12765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLACK, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. He argues that the Roswell Municipal Court bench warrant was invalid, and if it was not, Officer Steinbeck was not authorized to execute it in Dexter. The trial court made the following rulings: (1) the warrant was valid, even though not based on a sworn affidavit; and (2) the arrest was legal because a Chaves County sheriff’s deputy has the authority to arrest a person in Chaves County based on a Roswell Municipal Court bench warrant. We affirm.

FACTS

Marvin Steinbeck, a police officer in Dexter, stopped Defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Oscar Ramos QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Rex G. Endicott, United States of America v. John Stuart RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. SuttonTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Cities Service Oil Company v. Coleman Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  5. Salt Lake City v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Roark v. Farmers Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. MohsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API