Legal Opinion

United States v. Rex G. Endicott, United States of America v. John Stuart Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1986No. 85-3128, 85-3129PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*508POOLE, Circuit Judge:

Two codefendants, Rex G. Endicott and John S. Robertson, appeal their convictions for conspiracy to illegally receive, possess, transfer and import firearms and for substantive violations of federal firearms laws. We deal with each appeal separately.

REX G. ENDICOTT

PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

In November, 1982, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) began an undercover investigation of the Bandido Motorcycle gang for suspected violations of federal narcotics laws. The investigation subsequently focused on possible violations of federal firearms laws. A DEA informant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Chua Han Mow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. John Waldo Birges, Sr., Terry Lee HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API