Legal Opinion

Hood v. . Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against defendants. The defendants deny negligence and set up the plea of contributory negligence and res judicata. "That prior to the institution of this action, to wit: on 9 October, 1931, this plaintiff had about June, 1930, instituted another action in the Superior Court of Gaston County, against the said John Mitchell, chief State bank examiner, and that his complaint set forth as his cause of action the exact statement of facts as set forth in the complaint filed in this cause, and the issues to be decided were exactly the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Tousey v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Scott v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. In Re LaFayette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Goodrich v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API