Legal Opinion

Martin v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1999No. 980262PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Gloria Martin appeals from the district court’s order and corrected judgment. Rodney Rath cross-appeals. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2.] On June 4, 1980, Gloria Rath, now known as Gloria Martin, and Rodney Rath divorced under a decree awarding her custody of their minor children, and establishing Rath’s child support obligation of $220 per month. The child support obligation decreased to $110 per month in October 1988 and terminated in May 1990 as the two children reached majority.

[¶ 3.] Rath’s payments of his child support obligation can be described, at best, as rare.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cuna Mortgage v. AafedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Zarrett v. ZarrettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Vandall v. Trinity HospitalsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bornsen v. Pragotrade, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sundance Oil and Gas, LLC v. Hess CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API