United States v. Salvatore Battaglia, United States of America v. Joseph Amabile, United States of America v. Dave Evans
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*1117CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants’ convictions of violation of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) were previously affirmed by this Court. 394 F.2d 304; 395 F.2d 47. Subsequently, the Supreme Court remanded these cases to the district court “for further proceedings in conformity with Alderman v. United States,” 394 U.S. 165, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176, so that the district court could determine, after an appropriate hearing, whether the convictions were tainted by the use of illegally obtained electronic surveillance.
Upon the remand to the district court, the Government turned over to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Milton Margoles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HaywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. Ennis M. Akin, Beverly Lloyd Hart, A/K/A James E. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Paul Clyde Villano and Pauline SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Waverly ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.