Legal Opinion

United States v. Palermo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 1969No. Nos. 16593, 16595, 16596 and 16677PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants were indicted for conspiring to violate the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, by interfering with commerce by extorting money from a builder and in so doing, interfering with interstate shipments of construction materials. The jury found all defendants guilty and from these convictions they appeal.

From 1962 to 1965 Riley Management Company, with William G. Riley as president, was building various apartment building complexes in suburbs surrounding Chicago. Melrose Park Plumbing was a subcontractor on Riley’s first construction project in Addison, Illinois, in 1962.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Oscar E. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Benjamin MallahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API