Legal Opinion

Smith v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1968No. 158PublishedCited by 738 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

announced by Mr. Justice Fortas.

In Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400, 403, this Court held that the Sixth Amendment right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is a “fundamental right . . . made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.” The question presented in this case is whether Illinois denied that right to the petitioner, Fleming Smith. He was convicted in a criminal court of Cook County, Illinois, upon a charge of illegal sale of narcotics, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal.1 *130We granted certiorari to consider…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by738 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

733 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API