Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haywood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1979PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

Wilbert Haywood appeals from his conviction of the murder in the second degree of George Anthony Willis. G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. Haywood claims that reversal of his conviction is required because: (1) his constitutional right to cross-examine adverse witnesses on the issue of bias was infringed; (2) evidence of an independent crime was erroneously admitted; (3) there was insufficient credible evidence to warrant his conviction; and (4) the substitution of an alternate juror for a juror who became ill violated his constitutional right to a jury trial. Haywood also seeks relief under G. L. c.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Giordano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API