Walsh v. Hagee
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Rory M. Walsh on his own behalf and as natural guardian of S.J.W., a minor, brings claims under the Constitution and several federal statutes alleging that the defendants 1 are participating in a government conspiracy to harass and assault him and his family. The defendants have each moved under Feder al Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), and/or 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter and/or personal jurisdiction, for improper venue, and/or for failure to state a claim. Because Walsh…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Walsh v. ComeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- William Penn Apartments, L.P. v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Walsh v. ComeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.