Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Grapsas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1993No. 91-2899-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

Attorney Nicholas C. Grapsas appealed the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law that he engaged in professional misconduct by failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, failing to keep the client reasonably informed of the status of her legal matter and comply with her reasonable requests for information concerning it, refusing to return the client's unearned retainer when she terminated his representation, misrepresenting to his client, staff of the Board of Attorneys…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Khaja M. DinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. GrapsasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GrapsasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Janet L. HeinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. GrapsasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API