Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Khaja M. Din

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2015No. 2012AP002695-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Khaja M. Din appeals that portion of a revised report filed by referee John Nicholas Schweitzer on April 9, 2014, recommending that Attorney Din be publicly reprimanded for eight counts of misconduct involving four clients. Attorney Din does not appeal the referee's findings of fact or conclusions of law, but argues that his misconduct warrants a private, rather than a public, reprimand.

¶ 2. After careful review of the matter, we agree with the referee that the appropriate discipline for Attorney Din's misconduct is a public reprimand. We also agree with the referee's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against GrapsasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HalversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas O. MulliganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. LueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas O. MulliganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas O. MulliganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API