Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Janet L. Heins

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2017No. 2016AP002454-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

2Per curiam

We review a report filed by Referee James W. Mohr, Jr., concluding, based on a stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Janet L. Heins, that Attorney Heins committed six counts of professional misconduct as alleged in the OLR's complaint. The referee agrees with the parties that a public reprimand is appropriate discipline for Attorney Heins' misconduct. The referee recommends, consistent with the stipulation, that we require Attorney Heins to submit the attorney fee dispute with her former client, J.R., to binding arbitration, that we direct her to abide by…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SosnayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HammisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against GrapsasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nathan E. DeLaduranteyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API