Legal Opinion

Abraham Properties, Inc. v. Engineering Design Consultants, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 26, 2008No. 0604830APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Troy, Paul E., J.

The plaintiffs have brought a special motion to dismiss the defendant’s counterclaims pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §59H, commonly known as the “Anti-SLAPP Statute,” and a motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). In addition, the third-party defendants have brought a motion to dismiss the third-party plaintiffs complaint. For the reasons more particularly stated below, the special motion to dismiss *679and motion to dismiss the defendant’s counterclaims are ALLOWED in part, and DENIED in part; the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint is DENIED.

Procedural…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API