Legal Opinion

Sarraille v. Calmon

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1904No. S.F. No. 3407PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated, in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to recover the amount due on certain three promissory notes executed and delivered by defendant to one Gamier, plaintiff’s intestate, in his lifetime.. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Findings were in favor of plaintiff, and judgment passed' accordingly. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was brought in the lifetime óf the deceased, and' was continued in the name of the administratrix. .At. the. trial plaintiff introduced the notes, in evidence and testified that nothing had been paid to her by any one on account…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. French v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. De Freest v. BloomingdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Gould v. ChaseNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Dutcher v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API