Legal Opinion

Hume v. Hart

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1952No. Civ. 8072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action, seeking damages for injuries suffered by her when she fell into a grease pit on defendant’s premises, which premises were used by him for the purpose of selling and servicing trucks. At the conclusion of the trial, by the court without a jury, findings were filed which recite:

“That on the 8th day of November, 1949, and prior and subsequent thereto, defendants operated a used truck and sales lot on the Southeast corner of 16th and North ‘O’ Streets, in the City of Sacramento; that there was a grease pit located thereon used by defendants in the conduct of their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fernandez v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Yoshiko Yamauchi v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API