Legal Opinion
Hume v. Hart
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1952No. Civ. 8072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action, seeking damages for injuries suffered by her when she fell into a grease pit on defendant’s premises, which premises were used by him for the purpose of selling and servicing trucks. At the conclusion of the trial, by the court without a jury, findings were filed which recite:
“That on the 8th day of November, 1949, and prior and subsequent thereto, defendants operated a used truck and sales lot on the Southeast corner of 16th and North ‘O’ Streets, in the City of Sacramento; that there was a grease pit located thereon used by defendants in the conduct of their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fernandez v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Yoshiko Yamauchi v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990