Fernandez v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
In an action for personal injuries the jury brought in a verdict for the defendant. Thereafter, the trial court, on motion of plaintiff, granted a new trial on the sole ground that certain instructions “did not fully state the law on trespass.” On all other grounds set forth by plaintiff, the motion was denied. Defendant appeals. The city and county of San Francisco, as employer of the plaintiff, was permitted to intervene for the expenses and compensation it had paid to the plaintiff under the compensation law.
The accident occurred at about 11 a. m. on March 26, 1947, at the intersection of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Yoshiko Yamauchi v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Herold v. P. H. Mathews Paint HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Albers v. Shell CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
- W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Company v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.