Legal Opinion

Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 2009No. 81022-2PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 — This case involves a challenge to the Department of Revenue’s (Department) interpretation of RCW 82.04.423, which provides a tax exemption for certain out-of-state sellers. Until 2000, the Department treated Dot Foods, Inc., an out-of-state seller, as exempt from Washington’s business and occupation (B&O) tax. At all relevant times, Dot sold consumer and nonconsumer products through its direct seller’s representative, Dot Transportation, Inc. (DTI), and some of the consumer products ultimately ended up in permanent retail establishments. In 1999, in amending WAC 458-20-246, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Stroh Brewery Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Stroh Brewery Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ralph v. Department of Natural ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Steven Klein, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. S.J.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. SJWWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Amy v. KMART OF WASHINGTON LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API