Legal Opinion
Densley v. Department of Retirement Systems
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 2007No. 79951-2PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*214¶1
Alexander, C.J.
We are called upon to interpret a statute, RCW 41.40.170(3), that entitles public employees to retirement service credit in the Washington Public Employees’ Retirement System Plan 1 (PERS 1) for certain military service. James Densley appeals the decision of the Washington State Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) that denied him service credit under that statute for a portion of his military service that predated his public employment, to wit: weekend drills and summer training camps he participated in as a member of the Washington Army National Guard, time he spent…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Loeffelholz v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2013
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.