Legal Opinion

Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 27, 2007No. 35733-0-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.

¶1 Dot Foods sought a refund of business and occupation (B&O) taxes paid between 2000 and 2006, claiming that the Department of Revenue (Department) improperly denied them an exemption. During this time period, Dot Foods produced food products out-of-state that *877it sold (through a wholly-owned subsidiary) to dairies, meat packers, and other food processors located in Washington, who then used the products as ingredients in other products that were sold to various retail outlets in Washington. Dot Foods appealed to the trial court for a refund of the taxes, claiming that it qualified for a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DOT FOODS v. Washington Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Nelson Alaska Seafoods, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Nelson Alaska Seafoods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API