Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lynch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 2003PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Mark Lynch appeals from the denial of his Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (PCRA) petition. We affirm.

¶ 2 Lynch argues he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea:

1. because trial counsel unlawfully induced him to plead guilty when the plea agreement was illusory; or

2. in the alternative, because counsel unlawfully induced his guilty plea when no plea agreement existed; or

3. if a plea agreement existed, the Commonwealth violated the agreement by having the victim’s family testify and make sentencing recommendations.

¶ 8 The trial court found as a fact that defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. HickmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth Ex. Rel. James Dadario v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Pennsylvania Game Commission v. State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. RathfonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BedellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. OrlandoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API