Commonwealth v. Lynch
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 Mark Lynch appeals from the denial of his Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (PCRA) petition. We affirm.
¶ 2 Lynch argues he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea:
1. because trial counsel unlawfully induced him to plead guilty when the plea agreement was illusory; or
2. in the alternative, because counsel unlawfully induced his guilty plea when no plea agreement existed; or
3. if a plea agreement existed, the Commonwealth violated the agreement by having the victim’s family testify and make sentencing recommendations.
¶ 8 The trial court found as a fact that defense…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HickmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth Ex. Rel. James Dadario v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Pennsylvania Game Commission v. State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. RathfonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BedellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. OrlandoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.