Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Game Commission v. State Civil Service Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2000No. 104 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
We granted allocatur to consider the standard of review utilized by the Commonwealth Court in reversing the order of the State Civil Service Commission (Civil Service Commission) and to determine whether reversal was appropriate. For the reasons that follow, we find that the result reached by the Commonwealth Court was correct. Thus, we affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court. 1
A recitation of the somewhat lengthy facts underlying this appeal is necessary for a meaningful understanding of this matter. The Pennsylvania Game Commission (Game Commission) is an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State System of Higher Education v. State College University Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Westmoreland Intermediate Unit 7 v. Westmoreland Intermediate Unit 7 Classroom Assistants Educational Support Personnel Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.