Legal Opinion

Froelich v. United Royalty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1956No. 39,840, 39,841PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This opinion is on a limited rehearing in the above cases, which were previously consolidated for review in this court. The opinion quieting title in appellants as against appellees, thereby reversing the judgment of the trial court, was filed on November 12, 1955. (Froelich v. United Royalty Co., 178 Kan. 503, 290 P. 2d 93.)

A motion for a limited rehearing was granted in this case to redetermine to what fractional interest appellants’ title was quieted in and to the minerals in place.

On August 11, 1922, there was a declaration of trust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brungardt v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Froelich v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Bailey v. TalbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Dailey v. JoslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Heyen v. HartnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Morris v. Kasparek (In Re Kasparek)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Magnusson v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API