Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Talbert

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 29, 1956No. 39,798PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This was an appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs brought the original "action for cancellation of a contract of purchase. The trial court allowed reformation of the contract and entered judgment in favor of defendants for specific performance of the reformed contract by plaintiffs.

The First National Bank of Neodesha, one of the defendants, was only the escrow holder. Plaintiffs agree there was no issue between the bank and any of the parties and for clarity in this opinion we will hereafter refer to A.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maltby v. SumnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Lampe v. WilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Shannep v. StrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Brungardt v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wood v. HatcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Sutherland v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Anderson v. RexroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Sunflower Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Tomlinson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API