Adkins v. Unum Provident Corp.

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court are various motions filed by various parties. First, Defendant Unum Provident Corporation (“UPC”) has filed a motion to dismiss the claims against it. Second, Plaintiff Harold Adkins (“Adkins”) has filed a motion to amend his complaint. Finally, Adkins has filed two motions to append the record. For the following reasons, UPC’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Adkins’s motions are DENIED in their entirety.

I. Relevant Facts

This is an action brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) in which Adkins claims…