Legal Opinion
Valentine v. WideOpen West Finance, LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 20, 2012No. 09 C 7653PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
EDMOND E. CHANG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dan Valentine and W. Brand Bobosky bring this proposed class action against their Internet service provider (ISP), Defendant WideOpen West Finance, LLC (which does business as WOW!, but the opinion will lower the volume and drop the exclamation point), alleging that WOW intercepted their electronic communications in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.1 Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that WOW contracted with NebuAd, Inc., a third-party advertising service, to divert WOWs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Buonomo v. Optimum Outcomes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Legg v. PTZ Insurance Agency, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Alvin Reinauer, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Beckman v. Chicago Bear Football Club IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.