Legal Opinion

Rogers Galvanizing v. Richardson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 30, 1994No. 83057Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUNTER, Judge:

The issue before us in this workers’ compensation review proceeding is whether there is competent evidence to support the finding that Rudolph Richardson (Claimant) sustained a compensable injury due to heart attack he suffered during his employment with Rogers Galvanizing Company (Employer). We find competent evidence in the record supports the order of the three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court.

The forty-two year old Claimant had worked for Employer for eight years when he suffered a heart attack on January 7, 1993. At the time of the injury, Claimant was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Gabus v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Decker v. Oklahoma State UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Hughes v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Hurst v. EmpieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API