Rogers Galvanizing v. Richardson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUNTER, Judge:
The issue before us in this workers’ compensation review proceeding is whether there is competent evidence to support the finding that Rudolph Richardson (Claimant) sustained a compensable injury due to heart attack he suffered during his employment with Rogers Galvanizing Company (Employer). We find competent evidence in the record supports the order of the three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court.
The forty-two year old Claimant had worked for Employer for eight years when he suffered a heart attack on January 7, 1993. At the time of the injury, Claimant was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Gabus v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Decker v. Oklahoma State UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Hughes v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hurst v. EmpieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.