Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Empie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 20, 1993No. 63991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
Before us on appeal is an order of the State Banking Board affirming State Banking Commissioner’s order removing Phil R. Hurst from the board of directors of Oklahoma National Bank & Trust Company in Sulphur, Oklahoma (Bank), finding that the attorney/director was “reckless” within the meaning of 6 O.S.Supp.1982 § 210 (subsequently amended). Section 210 provided:
Any officer, director or employee of a bank or trust company found by the Commissioner to be dishonest, reckless, unfit to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the institution, or practicing a continuing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- TIB CORP. v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shadoan v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- JLEE Co. v. Reneau Seed Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Rogers Galvanizing v. RichardsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994