Legal Opinion

Gabus v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1984No. 58171PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice:

The question presented in this appeal is whether the opinion of an investigating officer, relating the cause of an automobile-pedestrian accident, is admissible under the Oklahoma Evidence Code, 12 O.S.1981, § 2101, et seq.

Appellant, Louise Gabus, was the plaintiff below. She brings this appeal from the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the investigating officer of an automobile-pedestrian accident was permitted to state his opinion that the accident was caused by appellant’s failure to yield the right of way.

At approximately 6:40 a.m. on October 2,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Lollis v. Superior Sales Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Kleibrink v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Frase v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Simpson v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API