Legal Opinion

Lonasco v. A-Best Products Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 2000No. Appeal of Garlock, Inc. (at 2954, 3309 PHL 1998); Appeal of Owens-Corning (formerly known as Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation)(at 2955 EDA 1999); Appeal of Garlock, Inc. (at 3314 PHL 1998)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 This is a consolidated appeal from the orders entered on September 25, 1998, and August 27, 1999, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The underlying action was initiated by plaintiffs Raymond and Ann Lonasco who sought to recover damages from several manufacturers of asbestos and asbestos-containing products. A “reverse-bifurcated” proceeding was held, and the consolidation of additional cases occurred during the liability portion. Two separate juries rendered verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon review, we affirm the orders of the trial court.

¶ 2 In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Goldstein v. Phillip Morris, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Maya v. Johnson & JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API