Goldstein v. Phillip Morris, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶ 1 Gilbert and Lois. Goldstein appeal from the orders granting summary judgment in favor of Philip Morris, Incorporated (PMI). Upon review, we affirm.
¶ 2 The Goldsteins filed this products liabibty case on July 25, 2000. Gilbert Goldstein was diagnosed with lung cancer after more than thirty years of smoking PMI’s cigarettes. In their Complaint, Appellants assert causes of action in strict liability, negligence and conspiracy. The strict liability and negligence claims were based on theories of both inadequate warnings and design defect. In their civil conspiracy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Phillips v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Alpart v. General Land Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Weston v. Northampton Personal Care, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.