Legal Opinion
South Shell Investment v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided December 6, 1988No. 87-77-CIV-7PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.
The trial in this case was held by the undersigned, without of a jury, on September 8, 1988, and continuing through September 13, 1988, in Wilmington, North Carolina. Plaintiffs, developers of an area known as Shell Island, allege that the Town of Wrightsville Beach (Town) imposed and collected utility system impact fees 1 and tap fees for water and sewer services in violation of federal and state law. Plaintiffs set forth four claims for relief in their complaint. First, plaintiffs allege that the Town violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Handy v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- American Fabricare v. Township of FallsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v. City of Rocky MountDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.