Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Keehan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 1987No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 1, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission charged Michael Patrick Keehan with violation of former Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 1-101(A):

A lawyer is subject to discipline if he has made a materially false statement in, or if he has deliberately failed to disclose a material fact requested in connection with, his application for admission to the bar.[ 1 ]

Pursuant to Md. Rule BY10, we referred the matter to the Honorable A. Owen Hennegan of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. Judge Hennegan made findings of fact that led him to conclude that Keehan had violated DR 1-101(A).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Application of Mark W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Grievance Commission v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re the Appeal of RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. In Re LohmeyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JoehlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Bysiewicz v. DinardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SlateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance v. VasiliadesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KeppleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API