Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yeomans

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 2011No. 2581 EDA 2010PublishedCited by 216 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

Sanford Yeomans (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after he pled guilty to one count each of statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors, and patronizing prostitutes. 1 We affirm.

The pertinent facts and procedural history is summarized as follows: Although Appellant was originally charged with two counts of each crime, on May 5, 2008, he entered a guilty plea to only one count of each of the crimes. Appellant failed to appear for sentencing, and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest. The bench warrant was returned on December 17, 2009, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. PollardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by216 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Eichinger, J., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. McGarrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. MrozikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Aldea, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Allen, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API