Commonwealth v. Yeomans
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
Sanford Yeomans (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after he pled guilty to one count each of statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors, and patronizing prostitutes. 1 We affirm.
The pertinent facts and procedural history is summarized as follows: Although Appellant was originally charged with two counts of each crime, on May 5, 2008, he entered a guilty plea to only one count of each of the crimes. Appellant failed to appear for sentencing, and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest. The bench warrant was returned on December 17, 2009, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PollardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by216 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Eichinger, J., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. McGarrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MrozikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Aldea, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Allen, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.