Legal Opinion

Luke v. Scott

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1933No. 14,659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee prosecuted this action against appellants for damages occasioned by the cutting of two trees alleged to have been upon the lands of the appellee.

Complaint was in one paragraph, and alleged in substance that on the 22d day of September, 1931, appellee was the owner of certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, and had thereon a large number of ornamental shade trees known as the “Trees of Paradise;” that on said date the appellant, Albert Luke, acting for himself and one Lizzie Luke (Mary E. Luke), his wife, wrongfully and maliciously cut down two of said shade trees, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. LoopIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Levine v. BlackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Ridge v. BlahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API