Legal Opinion

Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 10, 1986No. 84, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

The case before us is one of first impression in Maryland. It presents one simple question for our resolution:

Whether a landowner in a developed or urban area has a cause of action against the adjoining property owner when tree limbs, vines and leaves, which originate from the latter’s property, cause injury to the former’s property-

We hold that under the circumstances of the instant case, there is no cause of action and that the only available remedy is the Massachusetts Rule of Self-Help. Thus, the trial court was correct in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke v. BriggsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Gallo v. HellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API