Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
The case before us is one of first impression in Maryland. It presents one simple question for our resolution:
Whether a landowner in a developed or urban area has a cause of action against the adjoining property owner when tree limbs, vines and leaves, which originate from the latter’s property, cause injury to the former’s property-
We hold that under the circumstances of the instant case, there is no cause of action and that the only available remedy is the Massachusetts Rule of Self-Help. Thus, the trial court was correct in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burke v. BriggsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Gallo v. HellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987