Ridge v. Blaha
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn
Plaintiffs, John P. Ridge and Kathleen P. Konicki, sought an order enjoining defendants, William and Lorie Blaha, from damaging an elm tree allegedly growing on the boundary line between their respective properties. The circuit court of Du Page County found that plaintiffs have no protectable interest in the elm and denied the relief sought. After reviewing the record, however, we find that plaintiffs do have a protectable interest in the subject tree, and, accordingly, we now reverse.
Plaintiffs and defendants are neighbors in the Village of Hinsdale, Illinois. Between their houses grows the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Holmberg v. BerginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Weisel v. HobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Merriam v. McConnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Love v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Fleece v. KankeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Love v. KloskyColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.