Legal Opinion
Fink v. Neal
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 27, 1997No. 96-450PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant John W. Fink appeals the decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (Committee), which found that he had violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and issued a letter of caution as the sanction. This matter is appealed to this court under Section 5 of the Procedures of the Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law. On de novo review, we affirm the decision of the Committee.
On September 8, 1991, Ruth James accompanied her brother, John Shelman, to St. Vincent Infirmary (St. Vincent) because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- In Re CorboyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving SimpsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Ward v. Dapper Dan Cleaners and Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Cortinez v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Gillaspie v. LigonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.