Legal Opinion

Nongard v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1959No. Civ. 23607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem. *

International Glass Corporation is a defendant, in a complaint brought by Nongard against the corporation and Scott, and is a cross-defendant in an amended cross-complaint brought by Scott against the corporation and Nongard. Prom an adverse judgment in each case the corporation appeals.

Nongard sued Scott and the corporation on a written contract dated and delivered on August 6, 1952, which reads as follows:

“August 6, 1952
“Mr. Conrad Nongard

650 South Grand Ave.

Los Angeles, Calif.

“Dear Mr. Nongard:
“Based on our various conversations, I am confirming our mutual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Brainard v. De La MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Putnam v. PutnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. Riverside International RacewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Pass v. Industrial Asphalt of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Higgins v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API