Legal Opinion

In re the Adoption of H.C.H.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 2013No. 107,383PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal arises from a district court’s ruling that Kansas courts do not have jurisdiction over this stepparent adoption because a Mississippi court had entered a child-custody order involving the child approximately 12 years earlier and had not relinquished jurisdiction. The district court also determined that a *821Mississippi court is a more appropriate forum to hear the adoption. The stepfather appealed, arguing the district court failed to apply K.S.A. 59-2127, which is the jurisdiction provision of the Kansas Adoption and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. In re People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. University of Kansas Hospital Authority & Kansas University Physicians, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. In Re Interests A.A.-F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Hays v. RutherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API