Legal Opinion

People v. Shields

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 6, 1995No. 95SA38PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the factual findings of a hearing board, but modified the board’s recommendation of a three-month suspension to suspension for one year and one day. The respondent has excepted to the findings and the recommendation. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be suspended for one year and one day.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1973. The hearing board heard testimony from the complainant’s and the respondent’s witnesses, including the respondent himself. After considering the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. People v. DietersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. GenchiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McDowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. SimsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. WotanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. In Re FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. In Re FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API