Legal Opinion
In Re Fink
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 27, 2000No. 99-558PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
Appellant Special Bar Counsel filed a petition of misconduct against appellee-attorney, alleging that appellee had violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and DR 7-102(A)(7) (counseling client in conduct attorney knows to be illegal or fraudulent) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.* A hearing panel held a hearing, concluded that appellee had violated DR 1-102(A)(4), but not 7-102(A)(7), and recommended a sanction. The Professional Conduct Board (Board) subsequently held a hearing and adopted the panel’s findings of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- In Re KarpinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000