Legal Opinion
In Re Fink
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 27, 2000No. 99-558Published
1Opinion of the Court
764 A.2d 1208 (2000)
In re Melvin D. FINK, Esq.
No. 99-558.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
October 27, 2000.
Stephen S. Blodgett, Special Bar Counsel, Burlington, for Appellant.
Melvin D. Fink of Fink and Birmingham, P.C., Ludlow, Appellee.
Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.
SKOGLUND, J.
Appellant Special Bar Counsel filed a petition of misconduct against appellee-attorney, alleging that appellee had violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and DR 7-102(A)(7) (counseling client in conduct attorney knows to be…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Dooley; Dissent · Johnson.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.