Legal Opinion

United States v. Loretta Bowens

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1975No. 74-2970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellant, Loretta Bowens, entered a plea of guilty to the embezzlement of bank funds in an amount less than $100 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, at which time she was 18 years of age. At the same time, she was sentenced to one year probation under and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5010(a) (the Youth Corrections Act), conditioned upon restitution in full and payment of a $200 fine.

Subsequent thereto, the magistrate who sentenced appellant was advised by a probation officer that the sentence imposed was contrary to the holding in U. S. v. Mollet, (9th Cir. Sept. 5, 1973, later withdrawn)…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Earl J. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Patrick Harley KenyonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Robert Bill Hayes, United States of America v. Neil Eugene MeickeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Steven Edward MolletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Durst v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Ellen BuechlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Victor C. BynoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API