Legal Opinion
Durst v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 22, 1978No. 76-5935PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
We granted certiorari, 430 U. S. 929 (1977), to decide whether a trial judge (or designated United States Magistrate) who suspends a sentence of commitment and places a youth offender on probation pursuant to § 5010 (a) of the Federal Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U. S. C. § 5005 et seq. (1976 ed.), may impose a fine, or require restitution, or both, as conditions of probation.
Each of the five petitioners pleaded guilty in a separate proceeding before a United States Magistrate to an offense for which penalties of fine or imprisonment or both are provided. Petitioners Durst and Rice pleaded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Ellen BuechlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert Bill Hayes, United States of America v. Neil Eugene MeickeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Loretta BowensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Steven Edward MolletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ralston v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Tuten v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Joseph Calder, Julius Calder, Thomas Didonato and George MongeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.