Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Harley Kenyon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1975No. 74-1616PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The panel as constituted in the above-entitled case has voted to grant the petition for rehearing in part and to amend its opinion by substituting the revised opinion presented for filing herewith; Judges Chambers and Goodwin have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the proposal to amend the opinion and of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge has objected to the amendment or requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is granted in part; the opinion filed January…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Sandra ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Pierre GuevremontCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Gary Lee WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API