Legal Opinion

Whirlpool Corp. v. Ketkeo Nakhoneinh

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2002PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine whether the employee proved by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) she complied with the notice requirement of Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-201 and that (2) her injury was caused by her employment as required by TenmCode Ann. § 50-6-103(a). We hold that she complied with the notice requirement and that her injury arose out of her employment. The judgment of the trial court and the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel is reversed. The case is remanded…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thomas v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fink v. CaudleTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hinson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by39 opinions

  1. Tryon v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Public UtilitiesTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Excel Polymers, LLC v. BroylesTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API