Legal Opinion
Southern Textile MacHinery Co. v. United Hosiery Mills Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1929No. 5122PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
The bill for infringement of complainant’s patent No.-1,050,433, issued January 14,1913, upon application of Edwin O. Davis, for a machine for uniting knit fabrics, commonly called a looping machine, was dismissed in the District Court, on the ground that the invention which was the subject of claim 13 in suit was fully disclosed in a patent, No. 1,050,432, issued to the same patentee on the same date, January 14, 1913, but bearing an earlier filing date.
On February 22, 1909, Davis filed his original application which disclosed the invention in suit and claimed it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ide v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Eastern Rotorcraft Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- National Battery Co. v. Richardson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Nestle-Le Mur Co. v. Eugene, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.