Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Pahnke
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 12, 2005No. 103CV06246OWWSMSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 57)
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is one of many civil anti-piracy cases brought by DIRECTV, Inc., (“Plaintiff’) in this district. In this case, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant SCOTT PAHNKE intercepted DIRECTV satellite programming in violation of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (“FCA”), 47 U.S.C. § 605; the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, also known as the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 (“Wiretap Act”); and California common law.
Defendant, appearing pro se, answered the complaint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- National Satellite Sports, Inc. v. Eliadis, Inc., D/B/A Melody Lane Lounge, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., D/B/A Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roseville Lodge No. 1293District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. JacobsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- DIRECTV, INC. v. WalshDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. PomboDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.